Home › Platform › SEO
Platform · SEO

Every page scored.
And then repaired.

SEO did not disappear because AI arrived. AI reads the same pages. The platform measures what Google needs, shows which pages hold you back, and writes the improvement you push live with one click.

The test is free. After that you buy credits from €25. No subscription.

geo.wildbos.com / Website › SEO
Website - SEO score per page Every page checked on what Google needs. /geo-for-saas 58 to 94 /what-is-geo 71 to 100 /blog/geo-vs-seo 44 to 88 /dashboard 66 to 96 /contact 35 to 72 Title and meta measured in pixels, not characters 200 pages per crawl

Short answer

The platform crawls your site, up to two hundred pages per round, and gives every page an SEO score from 0 to 100. That score looks at your title and meta description (measured in pixels, not characters), exactly one H1, at least two H2s, a canonical pointing at itself, hreflang if your site is multilingual, alt texts on your images, the length of your text, Article schema with a date, and a breadcrumb.

On top of that it reads your Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools, and pulls out the two lists that are worth money: terms that just miss page one, and terms where you are seen but not clicked.

Measuring

The SEO score and the GEO score are two numbers.

They look at the same page through different glasses, and we never mix them. Google wants a meta description of fifty to a hundred and fifty-five characters; an AI assistant simply reads the whole thing. One average of those two would measure both wrongly.

  • Titles and meta in pixelsA title may be 580 pixels wide, a meta 400 to 920. Counting characters does not help, because an i is narrower than a W.
  • How the page is builtOne H1, at least two H2s, and enough text to actually answer a question. Under three hundred words the platform calls a page thin.
  • What is in there that you cannot seeCanonical, hreflang, alt texts, Article schema with a publication date, breadcrumb. The things nobody misses until they are gone.
geo.wildbos.com / Website › Fix list
Snippet specialist Title max 580 px - meta 400 to 920 px NOW - 118 px too wide GEO, AEO and LLMO for software, SaaS and MSPs in the Netherlands | Wildbos VOF We do GEO. Get in touch for more information about our services. PROPOSED - 548 px - passed the critic GEO for software companies in the Netherlands | Wildbos Measure how often ChatGPT and Gemini name you, and let the platform update your site. WHY IT CHANGED one proposition, not three brand at the end meta answers the buyer Every wording passes a second model that checks the source rule, the length and the language. No pass, no button.
200pages per crawl
28days of Search Console in every window
4+1specialists and a critic on every proposal
€2.50per fix pushed live
Search terms

Search Console holds two lists that are worth money.

You connect Search Console and Bing by adding one address as a user. After that the platform reads a twenty-eight day window each time, three days behind, because Google does not report any faster.

  • Almost page oneTerms in position four to twenty with at least fifteen impressions. That is the shortest route to more visits.
  • Seen but not clickedSitting in the top three with a click rate under three percent means your title or your description is the problem, not your position.
  • Keywords with a target pageThe platform proposes terms, you approve them, and it checks per term whether it actually appears in the title, the H1 and the meta of the target page.
geo.wildbos.com / Website › Search terms
Search Console - almost page one Position 4 to 20, at least 15 impressions, last 28 days SEARCH TERM POSITION IMPRESSIONS geo agency netherlands pos 7.2 412 measure ai visibility pos 11.4 268 chatgpt visibility b2b pos 5.8 195 llms.txt example pos 14.1 151 Google and Bing, read through one shared account. Three days behind, because that is how fast Search Console reports.
Improving

Four specialists write the proposal, a critic holds them back.

Whatever a computer can work out itself it does without a language model: canonicals, alt texts, social tags, hreflang. For the wording there are three writers, and every proposal passes a second model that checks the source rule, the length and the language. No pass means no button.

  • The snippet writerTitle and meta, measured in pixels, one proposition per page and your brand name at the end.
  • The structure writerHeadings that answer the question of the page instead of repeating it.
  • The link builderInternal links to pages nothing currently points at. A page without an incoming link is a page nobody finds, AI included.
  • Rejecting is allowedReject a proposal and you pick a reason: made-up fact, wrong voice, wrong language, worse for SEO, unnecessary. That reason goes back into the system.
geo.wildbos.com / Website › Site files
Site files Five requests, no crawl. The gate before any measurement. robots.txt 12 AI agents checked ok llms.txt your proposition, for models ok llms-full.txt the long version ok ai.txt who may train on you missing - minus 5 sitemap.xml every page findable ok A robots.txt that shuts out an AI agent costs 25 points. That is the one mistake that makes all the rest pointless.

What the platform checks on every page

Title and meta

Width in pixels, one proposition, brand at the end, and the visitor question answered in the description.

Headings

Exactly one H1 and enough H2s to make the page readable for people and models.

Images

Alt texts that describe what is there. Missing on more than a fifth of them counts as an error.

Canonical and hreflang

Does the page point at itself, and does Google know which language version belongs to which country?

Schema

Article with a publication date, breadcrumb, FAQ where the page really asks questions.

Internal links

Which pages get no link at all from your own site, and which blog posts stand alone?

Client results

Measured with our own platform, in the same AI models your customers use.

The Human EdgeLeadership training for municipalities and leisure businesses

The Human Edge grew 1600% in six weeks.
And now ranks number 1 in its niche.

Many small companies think they cannot compete with the big players in GEO. The Human Edge shows they can.

  1. WhoMariska Pronk founded The Human Edge. For years she has trained professionals and managers in personal leadership and communication, from employee to director. Her approach works especially well in municipalities. Our founder Joost took her training himself.
  2. The problemYet AI did not name her. When a municipality asked ChatGPT or Gemini for leadership training, the big training institutes came up. The Human Edge was not among them.
  3. What we didWe worked on her website, wrote blogs about the questions municipalities and managers ask, and worked on her reviews.
  4. The resultSix weeks later AI names her on 16 of 30 buying questions, against 1 at the start. Ask Gemini who the best trainer is for personal development in the public sector, and she comes first. Above big, very well-known agencies. You just have to do it.
+1,600%AI score from 1 to 17, in 36 days
#1on their niche question, in Gemini and DeepSeek
×3AI visits per week, from 181 to 601
“He promises and he delivers. (…) We went up 15 points in score in one week… Low-hanging GEO (and so SEO) fruit exists!”Mariska Pronk, founder of The Human Edge, on Sortlist (translated from Dutch)
geo.wildbos.com / Overview - The Human Edge
AI score per measurement 6 AI models - 30 buying questions - share of answers that name the brand 0 10 20 22 Sep 1 29 Sep 5 Oct 11 Oct 28 Oct 17 +1600%
Buying question“Who are the best trainers for personal development in the public sector?”
  1. 1The Human Edge#1
  2. 2Xxxxx Xxxxxxx
  3. 3Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx
GeminiDeepSeek

Gemini's answer, 14 Oct 2026, asked in Dutch. Competitor names are hidden. DeepSeek also puts The Human Edge first. On 22 Sep no model named them.

Measured with the Wildbos platform: 30 buying questions, 6 AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok), every three days. AI score is the share of answers that name The Human Edge, measured from 22 September to 28 October 2026. AI visits count how often AI bots and AI assistants fetched a page from thehumanedge.nl, per week from Monday to Sunday (21-27 Sep: 181, 5-11 Oct: 601).

Reviews

What clients say

Reviews that clients posted themselves on Sortlist.

5.010 reviews on Sortlist
“Joost really makes us fly. Such drive and inspiration. The man eats, drinks, sleeps and lives GEO. (…) He promises and he delivers. (…) We went up 15 points in score in one week… Low-hanging GEO (and so SEO) fruit exists!”
MPMariska PronkFounder, The Human Edge
Sortlist · Sep 2026 · translated from Dutch
“Wildbos helped us improve our content strategy to reach our target audience with our key messages. (…) Next to this we wanted our content strategy to influence our leads coming from Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). This has been working greatly.”
AMAlexander MeulemaPartner Manager, Extreme Networks
Sortlist · Aug 2026
“What a talented marketer Joost is. Professional, fast and thoughtful. No hours of small talk, but straight to the point and from there decisively to a solution. I recommend Wildbos to everyone.”
MPMarco PostCEO and founder, Maxibel
Sortlist · Aug 2026 · translated from Dutch
“In just three sessions Wildbos helped me optimise my profile and sharpen our USP in a way we had not thought of ourselves. It completely changed how we present ourselves.”
AGAlbert GambaryanManaging Partner, BQA commit
Sortlist · Aug 2026 · translated from Dutch
“I am impressed by how they manage to turn even the driest and most complex topics into engaging and humorous content that sticks. (…) Since the collaboration, we have seen more consistent growth in the number of followers.”
FHFloor de HuuInternational Marketing & Communication, HB RTS
Sortlist · Dec 2025
“Wildbos is a powerhouse when it comes to marketing and communications. Always willing and able to think outside the bowl! I would really recommend this pro!”
RSRob SchalkerCEO, A fish named Fred
Sortlist · Dec 2025

All reviews on Sortlist →

The rest of the platform

Questions about SEO in the platform

Is this an SEO tool or a GEO tool?

Both, in one dashboard. You get an SEO score and a GEO score per page, and they are never flattened into one average. AI assistants read the same pages as Google, but they weigh different things.

How do I connect Search Console?

You add our address as a user in Search Console. The platform then finds the right property itself and reads the numbers. Bing works the same way through Bing Webmaster Tools.

Why are the numbers three days behind?

Because Search Console itself is three days behind. We would rather count a complete window than half of today.

Does the platform write on my site itself?

Only what you approve. You connect your site with our WordPress plugin, through your own code repository, or through Wildbos Edge. Every change lands in your log and can be rolled back.

What if a proposal is wrong?

You reject it with a reason. A proposal that fails the critic never gets a button anyway; what you see has already been through one sieve.

Do you measure Copilot citations from Bing?

No. Microsoft publishes no interface for that, and we do not rebuild a number we cannot back up. What we do take from Bing is search terms, impressions, positions and index status.

See which pages hold you back.

The free test gives you your AI score. Connect your site and the SEO list per page comes with it.