Knowing you lose a question is not a plan yet. This tab works out what the parties who do get named have in common, and says per question which page you are missing.
The test is free. After that, from €89 a month, cancel monthly.
The platform takes the buying questions you are not named on and reads the pages of the companies who are. Per question that produces three lines: who gets named, what their pages have in common, and what you do about it. You see up to twelve gaps at a time, on the questions that pay back most.
The pattern comes from the page type the page reader already determined. If nine of the twelve gaps show a pricing page, that is your assignment, not an idea.
Not a thirty-page report nobody reads. Per question you see who got named, what those parties share and what the advice is. That is it, and that is enough to start.
The first version of this analysis let a named company's own domain count as a source. That makes every competitor look authoritative. Now it drops out, and what remains are third parties: registries, quality marks, trade media, review sites.
The path this tab sets in motion.
Three competitors get named, you do not. That is measured, not felt.
All three have a page of the same type. Usually a pricing page or a comparison.
You have it written or you write it yourself. The platform puts it on your site once you approve.
Get named and the gap closes and the card disappears. If not, it stays.
No. No survey is involved. This is research into what AI assistants quote in your market and why, based on the answers we already measured and the pages behind them.
From the page type of the pages AI cites. Those were already read during the measurement, so it is a count and not a guess. Below a handful of domains the platform does not call it a pattern.
Because a list of a hundred gets nobody working. You get the twelve where the most competitors are named and you are not.
No. Sometimes the advice is a page, sometimes it is a missing piece on a page you already have, and sometimes the question itself is badly put. The platform says so too.
Yes. And advice you act on disappears by itself the moment the question is won again.
Start with the free test. Once your question set is set, this tab fills up with the gaps that pay back most.