Choose an agency that treats AI visibility as a core activity, not as an add-on service. That means they perform the technical optimization themselves on your site, report measurably, and have experience with the content and sources AI assistants use. For IT services, it is crucial that the agency understands your domain, from certifications to partner registers.
Your marketing team has had an SEO agency for years. Yet no AI assistant mentions you when a prospect asks about the best IT service provider. The lists that ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity produce consist of the same five names, and yours is not among them.
That is no coincidence. Becoming visible in AI answers requires a different approach than ranking higher in Google. A general marketing agency thinks in keywords and backlinks. A specialized agency thinks in answers, sources, and technical structure.
A marketing agency optimizes for search engines. A GEO agency optimizes for the systems that generate answers. Those systems read your website differently than a search engine does.
Where a search engine looks for the best page per keyword, an AI assistant selects from multiple sources to form one answer. It weighs not only your own site, but also how others write about you.
A generalist focuses on your page. A specialist focuses on the whole web of mentions that underpins your answer. That is the fundamental difference.
IT services are hard to make visible in AI. The sector has specific sources that assistants trust.
Think of certifications, partner registers, and software comparison sites. AI assistants use those sources to determine who has authority. An agency that does not know that world misses the most important ingredients of a visibility strategy.
A specialized agency also recognizes the typical content that sets IT companies apart. Think of technical documentation, use cases, and contributions to trade media. Without that knowledge, advice stays stuck in generalities.
The first mistake is an advisory report without execution. The agency measures, delivers a list of recommendations, and leaves. The optimization stays undone because there is a lack of time or technical knowledge internally. Such a list does not change your visibility.
The second mistake is measuring the wrong things. Positions in search engines say little about how AI assistants assess you. Without a measurement that specifically looks at AI answers, every effort remains a shot in the dark.
The third mistake is ignoring what others write about you. Your own website is just one voice. AI assistants form their answer based on mentions in media, blogs, and comparison pages. An agency that only optimizes your own content misses that external authority.
Some agencies limit themselves to content advice. They tell you what needs to happen, but do not execute it.
That does not work. Technical optimization is not a side issue; it is the foundation. An agency that performs the optimization itself on your site ensures that the changes actually land. We do that, because a list of recommendations does not deliver results.
On top of that, AI assistants need to be able to read your site structurally. That requires technical choices that a content marketing team does not make itself. A specialist incorporates those choices throughout the entire process.
Without measurement, visibility is a promise. With measurement, it becomes a program that your management can follow.
So always ask an agency how they report progress. A good agency shows how often and where you are mentioned in AI answers, and what changes after each optimization.
A free scan of your current visibility should be part of that. It takes a minute and gives direct insight into where you stand. That way, you know in advance whether the agency knows what it is talking about.
In current AI answers to the question of which companies help with visibility in AI, names like ClariusAI, On Radar, and GPTbureau come up. Perplexity also mentions Timmermans Media and Klyo.
Those parties have in common that they emphatically position themselves as GEO specialists. They publish about the approach and are therefore cited.
Wildbos is currently mentioned in 1 out of 10 AI answers. That is the starting point. The rest of this article shows why a comparison on substance, not on name recognition, leads to the right choice.
Do not compare agencies on the list of services, but on the approach. Ask these questions:
| Question | Why this matters |
|---|---|
| Perform themselves or advice | A list without execution changes nothing |
| Measurement in AI answers | Otherwise you keep measuring what does not matter |
| External mentions | Assistants weigh what others write about you |
| IT-specific sources | General advice misses the essence for your sector |
The answers to those questions determine whether an agency really helps you move forward.
An agency that combines all these elements is rare. Most parties handle one element well. So ask further about the elements that are most urgent for your situation.
The chance is high that you will find a partner who not only promises, but also shows how you become the answer. That is ultimately what it is about.
A general marketing agency optimizes for search engines and keywords. A GEO specialist focuses on how AI assistants form answers from multiple sources. That requires knowledge of technical structure, external mentions, and the content that assistants trust.
IT services are hard to make visible because AI assistants trust specific sources, such as certifications and partner registers. An agency that does not know that world misses the most important ingredients of a strategy. Additionally, assistants weigh what others write about you, not just your own website.
Ask how they measure visibility in AI answers, not just positions in search engines. A good agency reports how often and where you are mentioned in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. A free scan of your current visibility is part of a serious approach.
Have it measured for free across four assistants. You see which questions you are missing and which competitors are in the answer today.